A Comparative Review of the Jurisprudential Rulings of the First Eleven Verses of Surah Al-Tawbah in the Light of Tafsir Ahkam Al-Qur’an and Tafsir Mazhari

Authors

  • Hafiz Usama Munir Research Scholar, Department of Islamic Studies, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur
  • Khalid Mahmood Arif PHD Scholar, Department of Islamic Studies, University of Sargodha
  • Dr. Iftikhar Alam PhD Islamic Studies, University of Sargodha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36755/iqan.v2i01.373

Keywords:

Tafsīr Mazharī, Ahkām-ul-Qur’an, jurisprudential discourses, tajwīd, recitation

Abstract

T?be?n and Taba T?be?n strived hard to prevent any kind of debate based on the color and differences of debate, following the path of the Sah?bah (may Allah be pleased with them). This series of tafs?r of the Holy Quran continued with all the changing requirements of the time and the commentary discussions of the Holy Qur'an. The status of Tafs?r also gained a prominent position and the status of permanent knowledge. According to the order of the Holy Qur'an, every verse of the Holy Qur'an began to be interpreted and the publication of Tafsir Ilm-e-Tafs?r started from almost here.

The most basic source of Qur'anic commentary is the Holy Qur'an itself. Prophet? was the first commentator of the Qur'an. The character of Muhammad?, his method, Sunnah and habits are all part of the interpretation of the Qur'an. The Prophet? has clearly described the issues facing the people of that time.

Similarly, the special thing in Qazi San?ullah's book ‘Tafs?r Mazhar?’ is that in this book he discusses the topics of the sciences of recitation and tajw?d, recitation continuously, Shazah and other recitations in great detail. Also included are important topics such as lexicography and derivation and grammar discussions, commentary on the inter-verses of the verses and verses, and the revelation of glory and the jurisprudential discussions of the verses. It is needed to compare the jurisprudential discourses of the Qur'anic verses between these two commentaries and present their merits together so that the seekers of knowledge can benefit from the merits of both the commentaries. Consequently, in view of this motive, a quick work has been chosen on this regard, because this article cannot be so thick as to give an entire comparative overview of these interpretations. A comparative look at of the jurisprudential injunctions of Surah At-Toubah between Jass?s and Tafs?r Mazhar? might be performed below the identify.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-31

How to Cite

Munir, H. U., Arif, K. M., & Alam , D. I. . (2019). A Comparative Review of the Jurisprudential Rulings of the First Eleven Verses of Surah Al-Tawbah in the Light of Tafsir Ahkam Al-Qur’an and Tafsir Mazhari. ĪQĀN, 2(01), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.36755/iqan.v2i01.373

Issue

Section

Articles